All of the points that I will mention here have been treated of extensively by folks far more knowledgeable and qualified than I, such as Peter Kwasnewski, Shawn Tribe, Jeffrey Ostrowski, and Gregory DiPippo. Yet, I still desire to articulate these points myself and for my own friends and family who may be reading!
your criticism of the current form of the Roman rite is nothing but the same tired, boilerplate traditionalist talking points. in many places you demonstrate a very limited knowledge of history, and poor liturgical formation in general. I say that because you criticize even elements of the reform that are precisely a restoration of the most fitting and ancient practices to the Roman liturgy- for example, the Eucharistic prayer being audible, and only said after the Sanctus is completed.
your criticism of the current form of the Roman rite is nothing but the same tired, boilerplate traditionalist talking points. in many places you demonstrate a very limited knowledge of history, and poor liturgical formation in general. I say that because you criticize even elements of the reform that are precisely a restoration of the most fitting and ancient practices to the Roman liturgy- for example, the Eucharistic prayer being audible, and only said after the Sanctus is completed.